The term "stucco" is
used to describe a type of exterior plaster applied as a two-or-three
part coating directly onto masonry, or applied over wood or
metal lath to a log or wood frame structure. Stucco is found
in many forms on historic structures throughout the United
States. It is so common, in fact, that it frequently goes unnoticed,
and is often disguised or used to imitate another material.
Historic stucco is also sometimes incorrectly viewed as a sacrificial
coating, and consequently removed to reveal stone, brick or
logs that historically were never intended to be exposed. Age
and lack of maintenance hasten the deterioration of many historic
stucco buildings. Like most historic building materials, stucco
is at the mercy of the elements, and even though it is a protective
coating, it is particularly susceptible to water damage.
Stucco is a material of deceptive
simplicity: in most cases its repair should not be undertaken
by a property owner unfamiliar with the art of plastering. Successful
stucco repair requires the skill and experience of a professional
plasterer. Although several stucco mixes are representative of
different periods are provided here for reference Each project
is unique, with its own set of problems that require individual
solutions. When it comes to Stucco, Goff Home Inspections recommends
that it be inspected by using Thermal Image Scanning to detect
moisture and prevent mold.
Historical Background
Stucco has been used
since ancient times. Still widely used throughout the world,
it is one of the most common of traditional building materials.
Up until the late 1800'S, stucco, like mortar, was primarily
lime-based, but the popularization of portland cement changed
the composition of stucco, as well as mortar, to a harder material.
Historically, the term "plaster" has
often been interchangeable with "stucco"; the term is still favored
by many, particularly when referring to the traditional lime-based
coating. By the nineteenth century "stucco," although originally
denoting fine interior ornamental plaster work, had gained wide
acceptance in the United States to describe exterior plastering. "Render" and "rendering" are
also terms used to describe stucco, especially in Great Britain.
Other historic treatments and coatings related to stucco in that
they consist at least in part of a similarly plastic or malleable
material include: parging and pargeting, wattle and daub, "cob" or
chalk mud, pise de terre, rammed earth, briquete entre poteaux
or bousillage, half-timbering, and adobe. All of these are regional
variations on traditional mixtures of mud, clay, lime, chalk,
cement, gravel or straw. Many are still used today.
Revival Styles Promote Use of Stucco
The introduction of
the many revival styles of architecture around the turn of
the twentieth century, combined with the improvement and increased
availability of portland cement resulted in a "craze" for stucco as a building material in the
United States. Beginning about 1890 and gaining momentum into
the 1930s and 1940s, stucco was associated with certain historic
architectural styles, including: Prairie; Art Deco, and Art Moderne;
Spanish Colonial, Mission, Pueblo, Mediterranean, English Cotswold
Cottage, and Tudor Revival styles; as well as the ubiquitous
bungalow and "four-square" house. The fad for Spanish Colonial
Revival, and other variations on this theme, was especially important
in furthering stucco as a building material in the United States
during this period, since stucco clearly looked like adobe.
Although stucco buildings
were especially prevalent in California, the Southwest and
Florida, ostensibly because of their Spanish heritage, this
period also spawned stucco-coated, revival-style buildings
all over the United States and Canada. The popularity of stucco
as a cheap, and readily available material meant that by the
1920s, it was used for an increasing variety of building types.
Resort hotels, apartment buildings, private mansions and movie
theaters, railroad stations, and even gas stations and tourist
courts took advantage of the "romance" of
period styles, and adopted the stucco construction that had become
synonymous with these styles.
A Practical Building Material
Stucco has traditionally
been popular for a variety of reasons. It was an inexpensive
material that could simulate finely dressed stonework, especially
when "scored" or "lined" in
the European tradition. A stucco coating over a less finished
and less costly substrate such as rubblestone, fieldstone, brick,
log or wood frame, gave the building the appearance of being
a more expensive and important structure. As a weather-repellent
coating, stucco protected the building from wind and rain penetration,
and also offered a certain amount of fire protection. While stucco
was usually applied during construction as part of the building
design, particularly over rubblestone or fieldstone, in some
instances it was added later to protect the structure, or when
a rise in the owner's social status demanded a comparable rise
in his standard of living.
Composition of Historic Stucco
Before the mid-to-late nineteenth century,
stucco consisted primarily of hydrated or slaked lime, water
and sand, with straw or animal hair included as a binder. Natural
cements were frequently used in stucco mixes after their discovery
in the United States during the 1820s. Portland cement was first
manufactured in the United States in 1871, and it gradually replaced
natural cement. After about 1900, most stucco was composed primarily
of portland cement, mixed with some lime. With the addition of
portland cement, stucco became even more versatile and durable.
No longer used just as a coating for a substantial material like
masonry or log, stucco could now be applied over wood or metal
lath attached to a light wood frame. With this increased strength,
stucco ceased to be just a veneer and became a more integral
part of the building structure.
Today, gypsum, which is hydrated calcium sulfate
or sulfate of lime, has to a great extent replaced lime Gypsum
is preferred because it hardens faster and has less shrinkage
than lime. Lime is generally used only in the finish coat in
contemporary stucco work.
The composition of stucco depended on local
custom and available materials. Stucco often contained substantial
amounts of mud or clay, marble or brick dust, or even sawdust,
and an array of additives ranging from animal blood or urine,
to eggs, keratin or gluesize (animal hooves and horns), varnish,
wheat paste, sugar, salt, sodium silicate, alum, tallow, linseed
oil, beeswax, and wine, beer, or rye whiskey. Waxes, fats and
oils were included to introduce water-repellent properties, sugary
materials reduced the amount of water needed and slowed down
the setting time, and alcohol acted as an air entrainer. All
of these additives contributed to the strength and durability
of the stucco.
The appearance of much stucco was determined
by the color of the sand--or sometimes burnt clay--used in the
mix, but often stucco was also tinted with natural pigments,
or the surface whitewashed or color-washed after stuccoing was
completed. Brick dust could provide color, and other coloring
materials that were not affected by lime, mostly mineral pigments,
could be added to the mix for the final finish coat. Stucco was
also marbled or marbleized--stained to look like stone by diluting
oil of vitriol (sulfuric acid) with water, and mixing this with
a yellow ochre, or another color. As the twentieth century progressed,
manufactured or synthetic pigments were added at the factory
to some prepared stucco mixes.
Methods of Application
Stucco is applied directly, without lath,
to masonry substrates such as brick, stone, concrete or hollow
tile. But on wood structures, stucco, like its interior counterpart
plaster, must be applied over lath in order to obtain an adequate
key to hold the stucco. Thus, when applied over a log structure,
stucco is laid on horizontal wood lath that has been nailed on
vertical wood furring strips attached to the logs. If it is applied
over a wood frame structure, stucco may be applied to wood or
metal lath nailed directly to the wood frame; it may also be
placed on lath that has been attached to furring strips. The
furring strips are themselves laid over building paper covering
the wood sheathing.
Wood lath was gradually superseded by expanded
metal lath introduced in the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth
century. When stuccoing over a stone or brick substrate, it was
customary to cut back or rake out the mortar joints if they were
not already recessed by natural weathering or erosion, and sometimes
the bricks themselves were gouged to provide a key for the stucco.
This helped provide the necessary bond for the stucco to remain
attached to the masonry, much like the key provided by wood or
metal lath on frame buildings.
Like interior wall
plaster, stucco has traditionally been applied as a multiple-layer
process, sometimes consisting of two coats, but more commonly
as three. Whether applied directly to a masonry substrate or
onto wood or metal lath, this consists of a first "scratch" or "pricking-up" coat, followed by a second
scratch coat, sometimes referred to as a "floating" or "brown" coat,
followed finally by the "finishing" coat. Up until the late-nineteenth
century, the first and the second coats were of much the same
composition, generally consisting of lime, or natural cement,
sand, perhaps clay, and one or more of the additives previously
mentioned. Straw or animal hair was usually added to the first
coat as a binder. The third, or finishing coat, consisted primarily
of a very fine mesh grade of lime and sand, and sometimes pigment.
As already noted, after the 1820s, natural cement was also a
common ingredient in stucco until it was replaced by portland
cement. Both masonry and wood lath must be kept wet or damp to
ensure a good bond with the stucco. Wetting these materials helps
to prevent them from pulling moisture out of the stucco too rapidly,
which results in cracking, loss of bond, and generally poor quality
stucco work.
Traditional Stucco Finishes
Until the early-twentieth
century when a variety of novelty finishes or textures were
introduced, the last coat of stucco was commonly given a smooth,
troweled finish, and then scored or lined in imitation of ashlar.
The illusion of masonry joints was sometimes enhanced by a
thin line of white lime putty, graphite, or some other pigment.
Some nineteenth century buildings feature a water table or
raised foundation of roughcast stucco that differentiates it
from the stucco surface above, which is smooth and scored.
Other novelty or textured finishes associated with the "period" or
revival styles of the early-twentieth century include: the
English cottage finish, adobe and Spanish, pebble-dashed or
dry-dash surface, fan and sponge texture, reticulated and vermiculated,
roughcast (or wet dash), and sgraffito.
Regular Maintenance
Although A. J. Downing alluded to stuccoed
houses in Pennsylvania that had survived for over a century in
relatively good condition, historic stucco is inherently not
a particularly permanent or long-lasting building material. Regular
maintenance is required to keep it in good condition. Unfortunately,
many older or historic buildings are not always accorded this
kind of care.
Because building owners knew stucco to be
a protective, but also somewhat fragile coating, they employed
a variety of means to prolong its usefulness. The most common
treatment was to whitewash stucco, often annually. The lime in
the whitewash offered protection and stability and helped to
harden the stucco. Most importantly, it filled hairline cracks
before they could develop into larger cracks and let in moisture.
To improve water repellency, stucco buildings were also sometimes
coated with paraffin, another type of wax, or other stucco-like
coatings, such as oil mastics.
Assessing Damage
Most stucco deterioration is the result of
water infiltration into the building structure, either through
the roof, around chimneys, window and door openings, or excessive
ground water or moisture penetrating through, or splashing up
from the foundation. Potential causes of deterioration include:
ground settlement lintel and door frame settlement, inadequate
or leaking gutters and downspouts, intrusive vegetation, moisture
migration within walls due to interior condensation and humidity,
vapor drive problems caused by furnace, bathroom and kitchen
vents, and rising damp resulting from excessive ground water
and poor drainage around the foundation. Water infiltration will
cause wood lath to rot, and metal lath and nails to rust, which
eventually will cause stucco to lose its bond and pull away from
its substrate.
After the cause of deterioration has been
identified, any necessary repairs to the building should be made
first before repairing the stucco. Such work is likely to include
repairs designed to keep excessive water away from the stucco,
such as roof, gutter, downspout and flashing repairs, improving
drainage, and redirecting rainwater runoff and splash-back away
from the building. Horizontal areas such as the tops of parapet
walls or chimneys are particularly vulnerable to water infiltration,
and may require modifications to their original design, such
as the addition of flashing to correct the problem.
Previous repairs inexpertly
carried out may have caused additional deterioration, particularly
if executed in portland cement, which tends to be very rigid,
and therefore incompatible with early, mostly soft lime-based
stucco that is more "flexible." Incompatible repairs, external
vibration caused by traffic or construction, or building settlement
can also result in cracks which permit the entrance of water
and cause the stucco to fail.
Before beginning any stucco repair, an assessment
of the stucco should be undertaken to determine the extent of
the damage, and how much must be replaced or repaired. Testing
should be carried out systematically on all elevations of the
building to determine the overall condition of the stucco. Some
areas in need of repair will be clearly evidenced by missing
sections of stucco or stucco layers. Bulging or cracked areas
are obvious places to begin. Unsound, punky or soft areas that
have lost their key will echo with a hollow sound when tapped
gently with a wooden or acrylic hammer or mallet.
Identifying the Stucco Type
Analysis of the historic stucco will provide
useful information on its primary ingredients and their proportions,
and will help to ensure that the new replacement stucco will
duplicate the old in strength, composition, color and texture
as closely as possible. However, unless authentic, period restoration
is required, it may not be worthwhile, nor in many instances
possible, to attempt to duplicate all of the ingredients (particularly
some of the additives), in creating the new stucco mortar. Some
items are no longer available, and others, notably sand and lime--the
major components of traditional stucco--have changed radically
over time. For example, most sand used in contemporary masonry
work is manufactured sand, because river sand, which was used
historically, is difficult to obtain today in many parts of the
country. The physical and visual qualities of manufactured sand
versus river sand, are quite different, and this affects the
way stucco works, as well as the way it looks. The same is true
of lime, which is frequently replaced by gypsum in modern stucco
mixes. And even if identification of all the items in the historic
stucco mix were possible, the analysis would still not reveal
how the original stucco was mixed and applied.
There are, however, simple tests that can
be carried out on a small piece of stucco to determine its basic
makeup. A dilute solution of hydrochloric (muriatic) acid will
dissolve lime-based stucco, but not portland cement. Although
the use of portland cement became common after 1900, there are
no precise cutoff dates, as stuccoing practices varied among
individual plasterers, and from region to region. Some plasterers
began using portland cement in the 1880s, but others may have
continued to favor lime stucco well into the early twentieth
century. While it is safe to assume that a late-eighteenth or
early-nineteenth century stucco is lime-based, late-nineteenth
or early-twentieth century stucco may be based on either lime
or portland cement. Another important factor to take into consideration
is that an early lime-stucco building is likely to have been
repaired many times over the ensuing years, and it is probable
that at least some of these patches consist of portland cement.
Planning the Repair
Once the extent of damage has been determined,
a number of repair options may be considered. Small hairline
cracks usually are not serious and may be sealed with a thin
slurry coat consisting of the finish coat ingredients, or even
with a coat of paint or whitewash.
Commercially available caulking compounds
are not suitable materials for patching hairline cracks. Because
their consistency and texture is unlike that of stucco, they
tend to weather differently, and attract more dirt; as a result,
repairs made with caulking compounds may be highly visible, and
unsightly. Larger cracks will have to be cut out in preparation
for more extensive repair. Most stucco repairs will require the
skill and expertise of a professional plasterer.
In the interest of
saving or preserving as much as possible of the historic stucco,
patching rather than wholesale replacement is preferable. When
repairing heavily textured surfaces, it is not usually necessary
to replace an entire wall section, as the textured finish,
if well-executed, tends to conceal patches, and helps them
to blend in with the existing stucco. However, because of the
nature of smooth-finished stucco, patching a number of small
areas scattered over one elevation may not be a successful
repair approach unless the stucco has been previously painted,
or is to be painted following the repair work. On unpainted
stucco such patches are hard to conceal, because they may not
match exactly or blend in with the rest of the historic stucco
surface. For this reason it is recommended, if possible, that
stucco repair be carried out in a contained or well-defined area,
or if the stucco is scored, the repair patch should be "squared-off" in
such a way as to follow existing scoring. In some cases, especially
in a highly visible location, it may be preferable to re-stucco
an entire wall section or feature. In this way, any differences
between the patched area and the historic surface will not be
so readily apparent.
Repair of historic
stucco generally follows most of the same principles used in
plaster repair. First, all deteriorated, severely cracked and
loose stucco should be removed down to the lath (assuming that
the lath is securely attached to the substrate), or down to
the masonry if the stucco is directly applied to a masonry
substrate. A clean surface is necessary to obtain a good bond
between the stucco and substrate. The areas to be patched should
be cleaned of all debris with a bristle brush, and all plant
growth, dirt, loose paint, oil or grease should be removed.
If necessary, brick or stone mortar joints should then be raked
out to a depth of approximately 5/8" to
ensure a good bond between the substrate and the new stucco.
To obtain a neat repair,
the area to be patched should be squared-off with a butt joint,
using a cold chisel, a hatchet, a diamond blade saw, or a masonry
bit. Sometimes it may be preferable to leave the area to be
patched in an irregular shape which may result in a less conspicuous
patch. Proper preparation of the area to be patched requires
very sharp tools, and extreme caution on the part of the plasterer
not to break keys of surrounding good stucco by "over-sounding" when
removing deteriorated stucco.
To ensure a firm bond, the new patch must
not overlap the old stucco. If the stucco has lost its bond or
key from wood lath, or the lath has deteriorated or come loose
from the substrate, a decision must be made whether to try to
reattach the old lath, to replace deteriorated lath with new
wood lath, or to leave the historic wood lath in place and supplement
it with modern expanded metal lath. Unless authenticity is important,
it is generally preferable (and easier) to nail new metal lath
over the old wood lath to support the patch. Metal lath that
is no longer securely fastened to the substrate may be removed
and replaced in kind, or left in place, and supplemented with
new wire lath.
When repairing lime-based stucco applied directly
to masonry, the new stucco should be applied in the same manner,
directly onto the stone or brick. The stucco will bond onto the
masonry itself without the addition of lath because of the irregularities
in the masonry or those of its mortar joints, or because its
surface has been scratched, scored or otherwise roughened to
provide an additional key. Cutting out the old stucco at a diagonal
angle may also help secure the bond between the new and the old
stucco. For the most part it is not advisable to insert metal
lath when re-stuccoing historic masonry in sound condition, as
it can hasten deterioration of the repair work. Not only will
attaching the lath damage the masonry, but the slightest moisture
penetration can cause metal lath to rust. This will cause metal
to expand, eventually resulting in spalling of the stucco, and
possibly the masonry substrate too.
If the area to be patched is properly cleaned
and prepared, a bonding agent is usually not necessary. However,
a bonding agent may be useful when repairing hairline cracks,
or when dealing with substrates that do not offer a good bonding
surface. These may include dense stone or brick, previously painted
or stucco masonry, or spalling brick substrates. A good mechanical
bond is always preferable to reliance on bonding agents. Bonding
agents should not be used on a wall that is likely to remain
damp or where large amounts of salts are present. Many bonding
agents do not survive well under such conditions, and their use
could jeopardize the longevity of the stucco repair.
A stucco mix compatible with the historic
stucco should be selected after analyzing the existing stucco.
It can be adapted from a standard traditional mix of the period,
or based on one of the mixes included here. Stucco consisting
mostly of portland cement generally will not be physically compatible
with the softer, more flexible lime-rich historic stuccos used
throughout the eighteenth and much of the nineteenth centuries.
The differing expansion and contraction rates of lime stucco
and portland cement stucco will normally cause the stucco to
crack. Choosing a stucco mix that is durable and compatible with
the historic stucco on the building is likely to involve considerable
trial and error, and probably will require a number of test samples,
and even more if it is necessary to match the color. It is best
to let the stucco test samples weather as long as possible--ideally
one year, or at least through a change of seasons, in order to
study the durability of the mix and its compatibility with the
existing stucco, as well as the weathering of the tint if the
building will not be painted and color match is an important
factor.
If the test samples are not executed on the
building, they should be placed next to the stucco remaining
on the building to compare the color, texture and composition
of the samples with the original. The number and thickness of
stucco coats used in the repair should also match the original.
After thoroughly dampening
the masonry or wood lath, the first, scratch coat should be
applied to the masonry substrate, or wood or metal lath, in
a thickness that corresponds to the original if extant, or
generally about 1/4" to 3/8". The
scratch coat should be scratched or crosshatched with a comb
to provide a key to hold the second coat. It usually takes 24-72
hours, and longer in cold weather, for each coat to dry before
the next coat can be applied. The second coat should be about
the same thickness as the first, and the total thickness of the
first two coats should generally not exceed about 5/8". This
second or leveling coat should be roughened using a wood float
with a nail protruding to provide a key for the final or finish
coat. The finish coat, about 1/4" thick, is applied after the
previous coat has initially set. If this is not feasible, the
base coat should be thoroughly dampened when the finish coat
is applied later. The finish coat should be worked to match the
texture of the original stucco.
Colors and Tints for Historic Stucco
Repair
The color of most early
stucco was supplied by the aggregate included in the mix--usually
the sand. Sometimes natural pigments were added to the mix,
and eighteenth and nineteenth-century scored stucco was often
marbleized or painted in imitation of marble or granite. Stucco
was also frequently coated with whitewash or a colorwash. This
tradition later evolved into the use of paint, its popularity
depending on the vagaries of fashion as much as a means of
concealing repairs. Because most of the early colors were derived
from nature, the resultant stucco tints tended to be mostly
earth-toned. This was true until the advent of brightly colored
stucco in the early decades of the twentieth century. This
was the so-called "Jazz Plaster" developed by O.A. Malone,
the "man who put color into California," and who founded the
California Stone Products Corporation in 1927. California Stucco
was revolutionary for its time as the first stucco/plaster to
contain colored pigment in its pre-packaged factory mix.
When patching or repairing a historic stucco
surface known to have been tinted, it may be possible to determine
through visual or microscopic analysis whether the source of
the coloring is sand, cement, or pigment. Although some pigments
or aggregates used traditionally may no longer be available,
a sufficiently close color-match can generally be approximately
using sand, natural or mineral pigments, or a combination of
these. Obtaining such a match will require testing and comparing
the color of the dried test samples with the original. Successfully
combining pigments in the dry stucco mix prepared for the finish
coat requires considerable skill. The amount of pigment must
be carefully measured for each batch of stucco. Overworking the
mix can make the pigment separate from the lime. Changing the
amount of water added to the mix, or using water to apply the
tinted finish coat, will also affect the color of the stucco
when it dries.
Generally, the color obtained by hand-mixing
these ingredients will provide a sufficiently close match to
cover an entire wall or an area distinct enough from the rest
of the structure that the color differences will not be obvious.
However, it may not work for small patches conspicuously located
on a primary elevation, where color differences will be especially
noticeable. In these instances, it may be necessary to conceal
the repairs by painting the entire patched elevation, or even
the whole building.
Many stucco buildings have been painted over
the years and will require repainting after the stucco repairs
have been made. Lime wash or cement-based paint, latex paint,
or oil-based paint are appropriate coatings for stucco buildings.
The most important factor to consider when repainting a previously
painted or coated surface is that the new paint be compatible
with any coating already on the surface. In preparation for repainting,
all loose or peeling paint or other coating material not firmly
adhered to the stucco must be removed by hand-scraping or natural
bristle brushes. The surface should then be cleaned.
Cement-based paints, most of which today contain
some portland cement and are really a type of lime wash, have
traditionally been used on stucco buildings. The ingredients
were easily obtainable. Furthermore, the lime in such paints
actually bonded or joined with the stucco and provided a very
durable coating. In many regions, whitewash was applied annually
during spring cleaning. Modern, commercially available premixed
masonry and mineral-based paints may also be used on historic
stucco buildings.
If the structure must be painted for the first
time to conceal repairs, almost any of these coatings may be
acceptable depending on the situation. Latex paint, for example,
may be applied to slightly damp walls or where there is an excess
of moisture, but latex paint will not stick to chalky or powdery
areas. Oil-based, or alkyd paints must be applied only to dry
walls; new stucco must cure up to a year before it can be painted
with oil-based paint
Contemporary Stucco Products
There are many contemporary stucco products
on the market today. Many of them are not compatible, either
physically or visually, with historic stucco buildings. Such
products should be considered for use only after consulting with
a historic masonry specialist. However, some of these prepackaged
tinted stucco coatings may be suitable for use on stucco buildings
dating from the late-nineteenth or early-twentieth century, as
long as the color and texture are appropriate for the period
and style of the building. While some masonry contractors may,
as a matter of course, suggest that a water-repellent coating
be applied after repairing old stucco, in most cases this should
not be necessary, since color washes and paints serve the same
purpose, and stucco itself is a protective coating.
Cleaning Historic Stucco Surfaces
Historic stucco buildings often exhibit multiple
layers of paint or limewash. Although some stucco surfaces may
be cleaned by water washing, the relative success of this procedure
depends on two factors: the surface texture of the stucco, and
the type of dirt to be removed. If simply removing airborne dirt,
smooth unpainted stucco, and heavily-textured painted stucco
may sometimes be cleaned using a low-pressure water wash, supplemented
by scrubbing with soft natural bristle brushes, and possibly
non-ionic detergents. Organic plant material, such as algae and
mold, and metallic stains may be removed from stucco using poultices
and appropriate solvents. Although these same methods may be
employed to clean unpainted roughcast, pebble-dash, or any stucco
surface featuring exposed aggregate, due to the surface irregularities,
it may be difficult to remove dirt, without also removing portions
of the decorative textured surface. Difficulty in cleaning these
surfaces may explain why so many of these textured surfaces have
been painted.
When Total Replacement is Necessary
Complete replacement of the historic stucco
with new stucco of either a traditional or modern mix will probably
be necessary only in cases of extreme deterioration-- that is,
a loss of bond on over 40-50 percent of the stucco surface. Another
reason for total removal might be that the physical and visual
integrity of the historic stucco has been so compromised by prior
incompatible and ill-conceived repairs that patching would not
be successful.
When stucco no longer exists on a building
there is more flexibility in choosing a suitable mix for the
replacement. Since compatibility of old and new stucco will not
be an issue, the most important factors to consider are durability,
color, texture and finish. Depending on the construction and
substrate of the building, in some instances it may be acceptable
to use a relatively strong cement-based stucco mortar. This is
certainly true for many late-nineteenth and early-twentieth century
buildings, and may even be appropriate to use on some stone substrates
even if the original mortar would have been weaker, as long as
the historic visual qualities noted above have been replicated.
Generally, the best principle to follow for a masonry building
is that the stucco mix, whether for repair or replacement of
historic stucco, should be somewhat weaker than the masonry to
which it is to be applied in order not to damage the substrate.
General Guidance for Historic Stucco
Repair
A skilled professional plasterer will be familiar
with the properties of materials involved in stucco repair and
will be able to avoid some of the pitfalls that would hinder
someone less experienced. General suggestions for successful
stucco repair parallel those involving restoration and repair
of historic mortar or plaster. In addition, the following principles
are important to remember:
Mix only as much stucco as can be used in one and one-half
to two hours. This will depend on the weather (mortar will
harden faster under hot and dry, or sunny conditions); and
experience is likely to be the best guidance. Any remaining
mortar should be discarded; it should not be re-tempered.
Stucco mortar should not be over-mixed. (Hand mix for 10-15
minutes after adding water, or machine mix for 3-4 minutes
after all ingredients are in mixer.) Over-mixing can cause
crazing and discoloration, especially in tinted mortars.
Over-mixing will also tend to make the mortar set too fast,
which will result in cracking and poor bonding or keying
to the lath or masonry substrate.
Wood lath or a masonry substrate, but not metal lath, must
be thoroughly wetted before applying stucco patches so that
it does not draw moisture out of the stucco too rapidly.
To a certain extent, bonding agents also serve this same
purpose. Wetting the substrate helps retard drying.
To prevent cracking, it is imperative that stucco not dry
too fast. Therefore, the area to be stucco should be shaded,
or even covered if possible, particularly in hot weather.
It is also a good idea in hot weather to keep the newly stucco
area damp, at approximately 90 per cent humidity, for a period
of 48 to 72 hours.
Stucco repairs, like most other exterior masonry work,
should not be undertaken in cold weather (below 40 degrees
Fahrenheit, and preferably warmer), or if there is danger
of frost.
Historic Stucco Textures
Most of the oldest stucco in the U.S. dating
prior to the late-nineteenth century, will generally have a smooth,
troweled finish (sometimes called a sand or float finish), possibly
scored to resemble ashlar masonry units. Scoring may be incised
to simulate masonry joints, the scored lines may be emphasized
by black or white penciling, or the lines may simply be drawn
or painted on the surface of the stucco. In some regions, at
least as early as the first decades of the nineteenth century,
it was not uncommon to use a roughcast finish on the foundation
or base of an otherwise smooth-surfaced building. Roughcast was
also used as an overall stucco finish for some outbuildings,
and other less important types of structures.
A wide variety of decorative surface textures
may be found on revival style stucco buildings, particularly
residential architecture. These styles evolved in the late-nineteenth
century and peaked in popularity in the early decades of the
twentieth century. Frank Lloyd Wright favored a smooth finish
stucco, which was imitated on much of the Prairie style architecture
inspired by his work. Some of the more picturesque surface textures
include: English Cottage or English Cotswold finish; sponge finish;
fan texture; adobe finish; and Spanish or Italian finish. Many
of these finishes and countless other regional and personalized
variations on them are still in use.
The most common early-twentieth
century stucco finishes are often found on bungalow-style houses,
and include: spatter or spatterdash (sometimes called roughcast,
harling, or wetdash), and pebble-dash or drydash. The spatterdash
finish is applied by throwing the stucco mortar against the
wall using a whisk broom or a stiff fiber brush, and it requires
considerable skill on the part of the plasterer to achieve
a consistently rough wall surface. The mortar used to obtain
this texture is usually composed simply of a regular sand,
lime, and cement mortar, although it may sometimes contain
small pebbles or crushed stone aggregate, which replaces one-half
the normal sand content. The pebble-dash or dry dash finish
is accomplished manually by the plasterer throwing or "dashing" dry pebbles (about 1/8" to
1/4" in size), onto a coat of stucco freshly applied by another
plasterer. The pebbles must be thrown at the wall with a scoop
with sufficient force and skill that they will stick to the stucco
wall. A more even or uniform surface can be achieved by patting
the stones down with a wooden float. This finish may also be
created using a texturing machine.
Stucco on historic
buildings is especially vulnerable not only to the wear of
time and exposure to the elements, but also at the hands of
well-intentioned "restorers," who may
want to remove stucco from eighteenth and nineteenth century
structures, to expose what they believe to be the original or
more "historic" brick, stone or log underneath. Historic stucco
is a character-defining feature and should be considered an important
historic building material, significant in its own right. While
many eighteenth and nineteenth century buildings were stucco
at the time of construction, others were stucco later for reasons
of fashion or practicality. As such, it is likely that this stucco
has acquired significance over time, as part of the history and
evolution of a building. Thus, even later, non-historic stucco
should be retained in most instances; and similar logic dictates
that new stucco should not be applied to a historic building
that was not stucco previously. When repairing historic stucco,
the new stucco should duplicate the old as closely as possible
in strength, composition, color and texture.